Apparently the first instance of graffiti appeared on the Lascaux caves in France. These included aspects of story telling, recreational fun and a community narrative. It was not an act of rebellion.
The Romans were big on graffiti. They drew lewd drawings for the public and also introduced Political Caricatures to poke fun at politicians.
In the Paris riots of 1968 a 'graffiti style' was introduced to graphic posters designed for the protesters. Graffiti was also used on the streets to express opinions. This scrawl proclaims "It is forbidden to forbid" i think.
Graffiti as we think of it today really kicked off in 1970's New york. Mostly poor men used walls as a canvas to express there opinion or spread there style. This was achieved with a spray can and used street language, with the primary goal of making sure that the poor communities were not ignored.
In the 1980's fine artists began to use street art to become popular. Advertisement company's used street art to sell products. Graffiti art became very mainstream to the annoyance of people who felt they were 'genuine' graffiti artists, who like tats cru began working for big corporations themselves.
Recently Graffiti art been elevated to high society. It has come off of the street and into art galleries. The likes of Banksy and Shepard Fairy are responsible for this transformation. In 2008 Shepard Fairy designed a poster in support for Obama's campaign, which became a sensation.
In the 21st century it is clear that graffiti of street art is used by art school graduates instead of people from the streets themselves. Many of whom carry out jobs for major corporations to support genuine street art in their private lives.
However Graffiti art also still carries out its primary function in poor and war torn parts of the world. People who need the world to hear them use surfaces like the West Bank Barrier to paint murals in a super sized format to get their message out, in the same way West-Germans painted signs of peace and hope on their side of the Berlin wall. Unfortunately even this space has been visited by popular artists from the west in a pursuit of fame and notoriety.
Monday, 24 October 2011
Thursday, 20 October 2011
PROVERBALLY YOURS// Research
Over the last few days I have been collecting images from various blogs
as inspiration for this brief, here are a few of the images which guided
me:
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6164/6216332527_6a1e3b32a5_z.jpg A poster for Hispanic heritage month, inviting people to a salsa dance. I chose to post this image because it relies nearly totally on type alone to give a message. Despite this it looks remarkably decorative. I'm rather stuck on my 'type only' poster and this is the sort of work I need to find more of, to point me in the right direction. |
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
PROVERBIALLY YOURS// Research
More inspirational designs I used to inspire my Poster work. I have tried to find stuff that is Text based, Image based and of course a mixture of the two.
Here the poster is almost all just one variation of a khaki colour. Armed with this the designer has created a poster with a lot of content. I suppose the lesson is that you only need one colour and black to create almost anything. Its interesting to note that the font used at the top looks like a knockoff Cola font. Why was this used for The Doors Tribute Band.
I have been looking at pictograms as a way to communicate in very quick and simple ways. Here is one designers idea of an updated airport pictogram system. This is a failure and a success in my opinion. A failure as the whole point for the existing system is the idea of simplicity, over complicating the pictograms only reduces its international understanding. It is a success because the pictograms are still understandable and in some ways are more interesting and decorative. However int his another problem arises; People glance these signs and are not looking for beauty but function.
These are some interesting designs by 123klan for Nike. They are illustrations of Mexican wrestlers. What interests me is the level of detail seen what are essentially fairly simplistic drawings with a limited range of colours. The style of the text is also very simple but very cool, filling in counters is something I realise a lot of designers are doing now. I also think the caps italics font is great, it adds some power too the text and complements the images well, especially in the second image where the wrestler almost points to the text.
This is an example of some heavily stylised text I though would be interesting to look at because I am at a crossroads with my Text only poster. Text like this does add some kind of emotion I suppose and is usually used to create a laid back homely feel to the design.The designer has also added some kind of texture to the work, is don't think this really adds anything really other than perhaps a slightly work look.
A humorous poster with similar dimensions to my own, text laid out like this is a common recurring theme in many poster I have been looking at so I should give it a go when for my text only poster I think. This is also a great example of a design which uses both text and image as well as a very limited range of colours. The style of using old 40's and 50's fashion is popular at the moment too but I think its becoming a bit repetitive. I think its popular with comedic design because the 50's were an era for naivety in many peoples eyes so it fits with the design above.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6168/6210612524_30cf3396df_b.jpg |
This first example features a style I really love. Multiplying a colour over whole image is a great way to print photographs with only one colour and black. I am limited to only one colour in black, so this could be a really useful tool. Also I have began a hunt to try and find the typeface this designer has used.
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6113/6214178072_1dd58bf7bc_z.jpg |
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6119/6215032240_f7f9fa6553_b.jpg |
http://www.123klan.com/upload/images/portfolio/nike-mexico04.jpg |
http://www.123klan.com/upload/images/portfolio/nike-mexico06.jpg |
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6146/6201439280_63b725250d_o.jpg |
http://www.flickr.com/photos/phildesignart/6209046180/sizes/l/in/photostream/ |
A humorous poster with similar dimensions to my own, text laid out like this is a common recurring theme in many poster I have been looking at so I should give it a go when for my text only poster I think. This is also a great example of a design which uses both text and image as well as a very limited range of colours. The style of using old 40's and 50's fashion is popular at the moment too but I think its becoming a bit repetitive. I think its popular with comedic design because the 50's were an era for naivety in many peoples eyes so it fits with the design above.
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
LECTURES// Post-Modernism
Short hand note taken from lecture:
Generally summed up by being:
- Confusing
- Contradictory
- Notoriously difficult to define
- Possible it doesn't actually exist at all.
- However it is a period that has followed modernism and responds to a post-modern era.
MODERNISM
Experimental
Privileges the new
Individualism
Progress
Purity
Originality
Seriousness
WANTS TO SAVE THE WORLD
POST MODERNISM (a response)
Exhaustive
Pluralism
Pessimism
Disillusionment with the idea of absolute knowledge.
WE CANT SAVE THE WORLD, we can only make things worse and hope it saves us.
-People Began to create at which was against the 'idea' of art. Here is a machine that destroys itself, showing how new technology will always be flawed.
SHORT TIMELINE!!
1964- 'Post Culture against elitist few' born
60's- Beginnings
70's- Established as term
80's-90's - Dominant theological discourse
Today- Fired and simmering
-Post-Modernism may also agree with the 'Global Village' theory, meaning everyone is treated as equals, which could also be seen as a modernistic ideal.
-Modernism was designed to save the world, housing 'projects' were built to save the poor from homelessness. By post-modernism it was realised that this didn't work and the projects were knocked down...
-Buildings made from cheap new materials in modernist era start to fall into disrepair so modernism gets a bad name. Moderism seemed to have taken design principals before human needs.
-Post Modernism has the aim of questioning modernism---> form before function can be good design also!
- The Guggenheim is an example of this, a massive building with comparatively little space to allow for beautiful architecture.
-Post Modern rules could allow for influence from all past architecture. Returning to a Neo-classical way of thinking. For example Maitland Library- Cambridge.
-Architects started exploring Complexity and chaos, mixing materials and styles to make something truly different.
-For example a post modern city is Las Vegas. Reflecting architecture and basic values that are exactly opposite to the terms of modernism.
Post-Modern Film looks at the idea of a "Dystopia' a reflection to the modernism ideal of 'Utopia"
- Films like blade runner are set in increasingly dark futures.
- Technology has enslaved people
-Advertising becomes a valid artform. Some claim it is the 'Greatest Artform of the 20th Century'- Mcluhan.
POST-MODERNISM
-Is Critical of Modernism
-Mixture of the highbrow and the populist
-Mixture of the Alien and the accessible
-Mixture of different styles and era's of all aspects of art and design.
-Questions Conventions
-Shift in theory and thought to and investigation into a crisis in confidence.
-Rejection of a total belief in technology
Generally summed up by being:
- Confusing
- Contradictory
- Notoriously difficult to define
- Possible it doesn't actually exist at all.
- However it is a period that has followed modernism and responds to a post-modern era.
MODERNISM
Experimental
Privileges the new
Individualism
Progress
Purity
Originality
Seriousness
WANTS TO SAVE THE WORLD
POST MODERNISM (a response)
Exhaustive
Pluralism
Pessimism
Disillusionment with the idea of absolute knowledge.
WE CANT SAVE THE WORLD, we can only make things worse and hope it saves us.
-People Began to create at which was against the 'idea' of art. Here is a machine that destroys itself, showing how new technology will always be flawed.
Homage to New York |
1964- 'Post Culture against elitist few' born
60's- Beginnings
70's- Established as term
80's-90's - Dominant theological discourse
Today- Fired and simmering
-Post-Modernism may also agree with the 'Global Village' theory, meaning everyone is treated as equals, which could also be seen as a modernistic ideal.
-Modernism was designed to save the world, housing 'projects' were built to save the poor from homelessness. By post-modernism it was realised that this didn't work and the projects were knocked down...
-Buildings made from cheap new materials in modernist era start to fall into disrepair so modernism gets a bad name. Moderism seemed to have taken design principals before human needs.
-Post Modernism has the aim of questioning modernism---> form before function can be good design also!
- The Guggenheim is an example of this, a massive building with comparatively little space to allow for beautiful architecture.
-Post Modern rules could allow for influence from all past architecture. Returning to a Neo-classical way of thinking. For example Maitland Library- Cambridge.
-Architects started exploring Complexity and chaos, mixing materials and styles to make something truly different.
-For example a post modern city is Las Vegas. Reflecting architecture and basic values that are exactly opposite to the terms of modernism.
Post-Modern Film looks at the idea of a "Dystopia' a reflection to the modernism ideal of 'Utopia"
- Films like blade runner are set in increasingly dark futures.
- Technology has enslaved people
-Advertising becomes a valid artform. Some claim it is the 'Greatest Artform of the 20th Century'- Mcluhan.
POST-MODERNISM
-Is Critical of Modernism
-Mixture of the highbrow and the populist
-Mixture of the Alien and the accessible
-Mixture of different styles and era's of all aspects of art and design.
-Questions Conventions
-Shift in theory and thought to and investigation into a crisis in confidence.
-Rejection of a total belief in technology
Friday, 14 October 2011
LECTURES// Modernism
-Commonly referred to as Modernity and Modern. i.e. 'Modern Art'
-Modernity also encompasses industrialisation, urbanisation. Massive changes in the way people lived their lives.
-As a by-product of all of this change artists responded in increasingly different ways. Moving away from a stagnated style of art. Modernism emerges out of the subjective responses of artists / designers to Modernity.
-Modernity implies an improvement of the old. In particular the consumer world was born, we were able to produce and sell much more. People began to take more for granted as a race.
-Enlightenment caused people to turn to science and discovery over god and superstition. People were educated as a national doctrine, meaning that the world was understood to a greater degree and religion was needed less/ used less by people as an explanation.
This is a short history of Modernity.... Notes taken from lecture.
-We saw Paris as the premier example of a Modern City in 1900. This was because of massive Industrialisation and Urbanisation in the city. Many changes were noticed by the population;
-More government and police control
-More people (overcrowding)
-Life Speeds Up, not much rest
-World seems smaller and connected, with rails and roads connecting everyone
-With big new inventions and ideas came massive social change. A huge culture race was started between London and Paris, to claim superiority as the worlds premier nation of enlightenment.
- Paris built the Eiffel Tower, it represented the key principles of the modern world:
-Grand Scale.
-Ambition/ Drive
-Use of modern materials, never used before.
-It also represented massive change, dominating the pairs skyline it said 'this is the future, its big and if you don't like it, tough, because its here to stay'
-Because the world was more connected by rail, ships, etc, world time was introduced to the industrial world, effectively causing the entire modern world to become regimented to their places of work.
-New degrees of human separation was experienced in the city. People would not know the people they shared their home-town with and one person became indistinguishable from another. As a result modern fashion was born and the middle classes upwards would dress in increasingly wild ways to stand out from the crowd.
-Napoleon destroys the old-poor centre of Paris and replaces it with much wider streets and upper class homes. This forced the poor into ghettos on the outskirts of the city, an idea which is till copied in today's cities.
-Old art (Monarchs, Myths, Stories, Religious) was replaced primarily by art with a focus point on the city, where people merely the participants of the new world.
-Growth in Psychology, scientists begin to work out how the human mind works, many people were concerned that the rapid growth of technology and society would drive people insane.
-As a by-product paintings became more emotional, dark with people looking more miserable and disconnected.
-Modernity forced art into a new place, art often believes that it leads the way but in fact it is more of a responder to the society it is placed in.
-As scientists start to experiment with new materials and ideas so do artists, which finally changed the face of art. Photography ruins the practice of realistic fine paintings, art is forced to become more experimental.
-Factory work REGIMENTS LIFE. People begin to plan their minimal leisure time separately from work and the two no longer intertwine.
-Alcoholism becomes a modern experience as alcohol becomes more available in a higher quantity.
-With the invention of the KiaserPanorama people realise that technology has become a fetish. People go to see images of the country side and buildings on a screen instead of going to see them for themselves. Technology becomes more interesting than the real world.
-Realism is abandoned as as photography changes the way we record images.
-Same thing happens in design. The Bauhaus is created with the modernist principles of;
-Anti-history. Look forward.
-Truth to materials. No painting wood, metals or concrete, etc.
-Form follows Function- with the idea that beauty can come from function.
-New technologies now used insead of ignored for the traditional standard.
-Aims to be international, compatible with all cultures and customs.
-'Ornament is a crime' doctrine enters the design world... trying to make things trendy means that eventually they will go out of fashion. Keeping things simple in form can create a timeless object.
-These principles then applied themselves to typography. Designers asked if serifs were needed in fonts some even proposed a scrapping of capital letters entirely. All excess stuff was to be scrapped.
-At the same time Times New Roman (1932) became a symbol of classic power and tradition, a direct attack on modernism.
-Modernity generally experienced between 1750-1960.
-Modernity also encompasses industrialisation, urbanisation. Massive changes in the way people lived their lives.
-As a by-product of all of this change artists responded in increasingly different ways. Moving away from a stagnated style of art. Modernism emerges out of the subjective responses of artists / designers to Modernity.
-Modernity implies an improvement of the old. In particular the consumer world was born, we were able to produce and sell much more. People began to take more for granted as a race.
-Enlightenment caused people to turn to science and discovery over god and superstition. People were educated as a national doctrine, meaning that the world was understood to a greater degree and religion was needed less/ used less by people as an explanation.
This is a short history of Modernity.... Notes taken from lecture.
-We saw Paris as the premier example of a Modern City in 1900. This was because of massive Industrialisation and Urbanisation in the city. Many changes were noticed by the population;
-More government and police control
-More people (overcrowding)
-Life Speeds Up, not much rest
-World seems smaller and connected, with rails and roads connecting everyone
-With big new inventions and ideas came massive social change. A huge culture race was started between London and Paris, to claim superiority as the worlds premier nation of enlightenment.
- Paris built the Eiffel Tower, it represented the key principles of the modern world:
-Grand Scale.
-Ambition/ Drive
-Use of modern materials, never used before.
-It also represented massive change, dominating the pairs skyline it said 'this is the future, its big and if you don't like it, tough, because its here to stay'
-Because the world was more connected by rail, ships, etc, world time was introduced to the industrial world, effectively causing the entire modern world to become regimented to their places of work.
-New degrees of human separation was experienced in the city. People would not know the people they shared their home-town with and one person became indistinguishable from another. As a result modern fashion was born and the middle classes upwards would dress in increasingly wild ways to stand out from the crowd.
-Napoleon destroys the old-poor centre of Paris and replaces it with much wider streets and upper class homes. This forced the poor into ghettos on the outskirts of the city, an idea which is till copied in today's cities.
-Old art (Monarchs, Myths, Stories, Religious) was replaced primarily by art with a focus point on the city, where people merely the participants of the new world.
-Growth in Psychology, scientists begin to work out how the human mind works, many people were concerned that the rapid growth of technology and society would drive people insane.
-As a by-product paintings became more emotional, dark with people looking more miserable and disconnected.
-Modernity forced art into a new place, art often believes that it leads the way but in fact it is more of a responder to the society it is placed in.
-As scientists start to experiment with new materials and ideas so do artists, which finally changed the face of art. Photography ruins the practice of realistic fine paintings, art is forced to become more experimental.
-Factory work REGIMENTS LIFE. People begin to plan their minimal leisure time separately from work and the two no longer intertwine.
-Alcoholism becomes a modern experience as alcohol becomes more available in a higher quantity.
-With the invention of the KiaserPanorama people realise that technology has become a fetish. People go to see images of the country side and buildings on a screen instead of going to see them for themselves. Technology becomes more interesting than the real world.
-Realism is abandoned as as photography changes the way we record images.
-Same thing happens in design. The Bauhaus is created with the modernist principles of;
-Anti-history. Look forward.
-Truth to materials. No painting wood, metals or concrete, etc.
-Form follows Function- with the idea that beauty can come from function.
-New technologies now used insead of ignored for the traditional standard.
-Aims to be international, compatible with all cultures and customs.
-'Ornament is a crime' doctrine enters the design world... trying to make things trendy means that eventually they will go out of fashion. Keeping things simple in form can create a timeless object.
-These principles then applied themselves to typography. Designers asked if serifs were needed in fonts some even proposed a scrapping of capital letters entirely. All excess stuff was to be scrapped.
-At the same time Times New Roman (1932) became a symbol of classic power and tradition, a direct attack on modernism.
-Modernity generally experienced between 1750-1960.
ALPHABET SOUP// Non-Format
For my current brief I have been looking at work by the
Anglo-Scandinavian design team Non-Format, which creates what I
understand to be very post-modern fractured style. I have included a few
scans from one of their books 'Love Song' which I took particular
interest in while designing the name-card for Eve. I wanted to use this
fractured style because I thought it may complement a fractured
typeface.
These pages make the use of type to effect the tonal values of the images they overlay. Its a very post-modern style so it by nature, completely pointless. Buts aesthetically is is interesting and if I adopt this style I could show off aspects of my typeface over image for the name badge.
I think I like Non-Formats styles because of collaboration between Modernist and Post-Modern styles. Use of clean, solid fonts for text and then filling the surrounding space with over the top decoration, images and solid blocks of colour all of it unnecessary but aesthetically pleasing.
Interesting use of a formula to create a unique typeface. The designer has set specific rules to follow to create this work. Vertical lines and a grid system confines the type to a set of rules, I should incorporate this into my own work. It allows for uniformity an structure. however at the same time I need to consider if this is what I want to say about Eve.
Heavy use of lighting effects and drop shadows that I could incorporate into my name badge design. I also really like the folded 3d style of the 'TRY'. It adds dimension to the work, all of these images allow the type have some motion on the screen. I also like the Stanley Kubrick reference.
These colour wheels highlight the main differences between RGB and CYMK. This is presented in a simple and interesting way by using white and black backgrounds. The colours create the typical heart shape from this well known and overused saying but add a unique touch to it.
Monday, 10 October 2011
CRITICAL STUDIES IMAGE ANALYSIS EXERCISE
Short essay comparing two posters. The 'Uncle Sam Range' and the famous Savile Lumley poster of 1915.
The two posters have many comparisons and contrasts. Firstly the style applied to the images. The American poster follows a very patriotic theme, red, white and blue colours, and the font is of a western type that is unique to America at the time, reflecting images of power and patriotism. Meanwhile the British poster uses more realistic pastel colours which create a feeling of calm and serenity. The font on this poster is in italics and is also hand-drawn, giving it a personal feel, like a letter that has been written to you. However the British poster also has subtle patriotism, in the English Roses on the curtains and the Duke of Edinburgh's ensignia printed on the seat.
The purpose of the British image is to recruit middle class men into the military, men who would otherwise be living comfortably, by making them feel guilty that they are not helping or sharing the glory. The girl is asking her father what he did to contribute to the winning of the war. He looks to the viewer with an expressign that either says....
- "I did many things in the war and I am very proud."
- "I didn't join in and will regret it for the rest of my life, because my children will not respect me."
.... depending on which way the viewer looks at the poster. The man also looks forward as if to pass the question on to the viewer personally. The poster was designed years before the end of the war but it is very much implied that the war has already been won. Firstly the war is considered "Great" in the poster, also the family looks well off; the boy is playing with nice toys, and the girl is reading a book, signifying wealth and education. All are well dressed. The toy soldiers are also very significant, they are the queens guard, the most aspirational regiment of the time. He is playing with them as if to imply that he may saying "even I can see that this is right and I'm only a child, I'm having fun and you will too". The soldiers also convey the idea that the war is just a game, the same as toy soldiers, 'and no-one gets hurt playing toy soldiers, do they?' The poster is set in and aspirational future where all is well in the world, except for the guilt ridden.
In contrast the American Poster is much less subtle in coveying its message; 'that America is the newcomer but is already light-years ahead of most other countries, especially when it comes to food, so you must buy this new cooker.' The imagery of the poster shows us that all of America has invited the world over to tea, and that the world is very impressed. The poster once again is aimed at middle class men, this time less educated people who could be persuaded by the tacky message. The slave and wife (domestic slave) follow their proper roles according to men of the time, in the setting of a grand house with a grand cooker. Again the poster is one of aspiration, its says 'buy this and all will be well with your family'. The three children signify territories of America that are growing strong and well-looked after.
In summery the two posters have four main points of comparison:
- Both adhere to the middle class.
- Both display images of Aspiration, a bright new future.
- Both are aimed at a male audience.
- Both carry national symbols and and are Nationalistic.
The two posters have many comparisons and contrasts. Firstly the style applied to the images. The American poster follows a very patriotic theme, red, white and blue colours, and the font is of a western type that is unique to America at the time, reflecting images of power and patriotism. Meanwhile the British poster uses more realistic pastel colours which create a feeling of calm and serenity. The font on this poster is in italics and is also hand-drawn, giving it a personal feel, like a letter that has been written to you. However the British poster also has subtle patriotism, in the English Roses on the curtains and the Duke of Edinburgh's ensignia printed on the seat.
The purpose of the British image is to recruit middle class men into the military, men who would otherwise be living comfortably, by making them feel guilty that they are not helping or sharing the glory. The girl is asking her father what he did to contribute to the winning of the war. He looks to the viewer with an expressign that either says....
- "I did many things in the war and I am very proud."
- "I didn't join in and will regret it for the rest of my life, because my children will not respect me."
.... depending on which way the viewer looks at the poster. The man also looks forward as if to pass the question on to the viewer personally. The poster was designed years before the end of the war but it is very much implied that the war has already been won. Firstly the war is considered "Great" in the poster, also the family looks well off; the boy is playing with nice toys, and the girl is reading a book, signifying wealth and education. All are well dressed. The toy soldiers are also very significant, they are the queens guard, the most aspirational regiment of the time. He is playing with them as if to imply that he may saying "even I can see that this is right and I'm only a child, I'm having fun and you will too". The soldiers also convey the idea that the war is just a game, the same as toy soldiers, 'and no-one gets hurt playing toy soldiers, do they?' The poster is set in and aspirational future where all is well in the world, except for the guilt ridden.
In contrast the American Poster is much less subtle in coveying its message; 'that America is the newcomer but is already light-years ahead of most other countries, especially when it comes to food, so you must buy this new cooker.' The imagery of the poster shows us that all of America has invited the world over to tea, and that the world is very impressed. The poster once again is aimed at middle class men, this time less educated people who could be persuaded by the tacky message. The slave and wife (domestic slave) follow their proper roles according to men of the time, in the setting of a grand house with a grand cooker. Again the poster is one of aspiration, its says 'buy this and all will be well with your family'. The three children signify territories of America that are growing strong and well-looked after.
In summery the two posters have four main points of comparison:
- Both adhere to the middle class.
- Both display images of Aspiration, a bright new future.
- Both are aimed at a male audience.
- Both carry national symbols and and are Nationalistic.
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
LOVE AND HATE
Love - The Art and Illustrations of Seb Lester.
I am a massive fan of intricate detail and here Seb Lester has bought it into illustrative typography. Lester usually works with large corporations in branding however he has recently turned to creating collectable artworks like these. Heavy influence from Victorian-esque script and letter-forms has just added to the spectacle for me.
Hate- Microsoft Word-Art.
I'm going to be honest, I find it hard to find graphic design that I HATE. Hate is a very strong word and in fairness I don't see many professionals creating terrible graphic design because they would not be professionals if that were the case and I would have never heard of them. However in 1997 when I was only 6 years of age I loved WordArt.
Love- The Zimbabwean Newspaper/ TBWA South Africa. 100 Trillion Dollar Posters.
Much to my surprise I was handed a 50 Billion Dollar (Z$) note in a Zambian bar back in 2008. When I got home I realised that the Zimbabwean inflation rate had been running at 10,500,000% while I was only 10 miles from the boarder. To raise awareness the Zimbabwean newspaper (a voice for the voiceless, newspaper in exile) ran a campaign in South Africa to inform people about the plight to the north. It would start as a small section of wall covered in the worthless banknotes with some simple type in the centre. Over days locals would come over and add more and more banknotes to the wall until it was absolutely covered in paper money with literally no value. One slogan I saw at a design awards two years later quoted "it would be more expensive to print this on paper". This is still one of my favourite pieces of design ever, it is a simply unique and incredibly intelligent idea.
Love- The Barnbrook Bible
Probably my favourite book that I own. If I get stuck this is often where I go. I'm not necessarily a huge fan of Barnbrooks social and political views, or perhaps its his need to shove them down your throat in very unsubtle ways. Despite this I have great respect for nearly every page of this book. Its funny, thought provoking, well designed stuff and that's what interests me the most.
Love/ Hate- AdBusters
I used to really love adbusters. Proclaimers of 'Culture Jamming' (top three images). I admire the magazine mainly for the parodies they create. I like their passion to promote free speech and reason and find most of the magazine very funny, much like a bi-monthly Barnbrook Bible. Unfortunately In #92 adbusters took Gandhi way out of context and used his enlightenment to justify mass-violence on the streets. I also turned to one page which told me to buy their shoes. I thought this might have been a joke, but it was not. I never felt that adbusters views where right or wrong (I never participated in their campaigns, I just enjoyed the design they were creating) but when I saw the hypocrisy and contradiction in that issue I lost a lot of respect for them. Fighting commercial style with the exact same commercial style, also preaching peace but also violence. Some believe adbusters has become a glossy magazine will ill-conceived content.
I am a massive fan of intricate detail and here Seb Lester has bought it into illustrative typography. Lester usually works with large corporations in branding however he has recently turned to creating collectable artworks like these. Heavy influence from Victorian-esque script and letter-forms has just added to the spectacle for me.
Hate- Microsoft Word-Art.
I'm going to be honest, I find it hard to find graphic design that I HATE. Hate is a very strong word and in fairness I don't see many professionals creating terrible graphic design because they would not be professionals if that were the case and I would have never heard of them. However in 1997 when I was only 6 years of age I loved WordArt.
Love- The Zimbabwean Newspaper/ TBWA South Africa. 100 Trillion Dollar Posters.
Much to my surprise I was handed a 50 Billion Dollar (Z$) note in a Zambian bar back in 2008. When I got home I realised that the Zimbabwean inflation rate had been running at 10,500,000% while I was only 10 miles from the boarder. To raise awareness the Zimbabwean newspaper (a voice for the voiceless, newspaper in exile) ran a campaign in South Africa to inform people about the plight to the north. It would start as a small section of wall covered in the worthless banknotes with some simple type in the centre. Over days locals would come over and add more and more banknotes to the wall until it was absolutely covered in paper money with literally no value. One slogan I saw at a design awards two years later quoted "it would be more expensive to print this on paper". This is still one of my favourite pieces of design ever, it is a simply unique and incredibly intelligent idea.
Love- The Barnbrook Bible
Probably my favourite book that I own. If I get stuck this is often where I go. I'm not necessarily a huge fan of Barnbrooks social and political views, or perhaps its his need to shove them down your throat in very unsubtle ways. Despite this I have great respect for nearly every page of this book. Its funny, thought provoking, well designed stuff and that's what interests me the most.
Love/ Hate- AdBusters
I used to really love adbusters. Proclaimers of 'Culture Jamming' (top three images). I admire the magazine mainly for the parodies they create. I like their passion to promote free speech and reason and find most of the magazine very funny, much like a bi-monthly Barnbrook Bible. Unfortunately In #92 adbusters took Gandhi way out of context and used his enlightenment to justify mass-violence on the streets. I also turned to one page which told me to buy their shoes. I thought this might have been a joke, but it was not. I never felt that adbusters views where right or wrong (I never participated in their campaigns, I just enjoyed the design they were creating) but when I saw the hypocrisy and contradiction in that issue I lost a lot of respect for them. Fighting commercial style with the exact same commercial style, also preaching peace but also violence. Some believe adbusters has become a glossy magazine will ill-conceived content.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)